Alleged ‘Manipulation’ In Reintroduction of Wolves

By: GPK Media

By Etta Pettijohn | For The SENTINEL

Public Employees For Environmental Responsibility (PEER) conjures up images of noble government workers risking their livelihoods to uncover misconduct and mistreatment by big government.
On June 7 the activist organization filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Interior alleging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) has permitted “political manipulation” to drive the decisions and actions in the  Reintroduction Program in New Mexico and Arizona, “severely compromising” the program.

A PEER news release alleges the FWS has allowed the number of wolves (estimated at 58) in the Blue Range Recovery Area, which includes portions of the Gila National Forest, to “threaten the population with failure.”

The group bases its allegations on the findings of a special Science and Planning Subgroup for the Wolf Recovery Team in 2010, which unanimously concluded that the, “Mexican wolf recovery required three populations of 200-350 wolves connected by corridors,” and “the best suitable habitat for reintroduction included southern Colorado and Utah.”

Along with several other environmental organizations, PEER is lobbying heavily to force the FWS to add more wolves to the recovery area, and to generally expand reintroduction efforts in the….